Ioannis Xilas vs Harry Wendelken Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Ioannis Xilas has a slightly lower recent second serve point win rate at 40.78% compared to Harry Wendelken's 42.03%. Could this indicate a slight edge in serve performance for Wendelken?
• In return games, Xilas appears stronger, winning 50.33% of points on opponents' second serves, surpassing Wendelken's 42.51%.
• On first serve returns, their performance is quite close, with Xilas at 31.03% and Wendelken at 30.21%.
• When under pressure, Wendelken saves a higher percentage of breakpoints, 56.09% against Xilas's 50.21%, suggesting resilience in key moments.
• Overall match win rates in the last year favor Xilas, winning 72.41% of matches compared to Wendelken's 66.67%.
• On different surfaces, Xilas is best on clay (65% win rate), whereas Wendelken excels on indoor hard courts (65% win rate).
• In tournaments over the past year, Xilas has a higher win percentage (78.26%) in lower-tier events compared to Wendelken's 68.29%.
• Considering opponent quality, Wendelken has faced slightly higher ranked competition, with an average opponent rank of 394.69 versus Xilas's 437.78.
• If the match reaches a deciding set, Xilas has a higher chance of winning based on his 57% win rate in these scenarios, compared to Wendelken's 54%.
• On break point conversion, Wendelken is marginally more effective, converting 39.04% compared to Xilas's 36.49%.

Editorial Prediction (November 22, 2025, UTC):

In reviewing the recent performance statistics, a few key patterns emerge between Ioannis Xilas and Harry Wendelken. Xilas demonstrates stronger performance in return games, particularly against second serves. However, Wendelken exhibits superior breakpoint conversion and saves, implying a clutch ability to manage high-pressure situations.

The overall win rate favors Xilas, particularly in recent matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF circuit, though it's crucial to note that Wendelken has consistently faced higher-ranked opponents. Surface preference may also influence outcomes, with Xilas excelling on clay and Wendelken on indoor hard courts. If this match unfolds on a surface aligning with Wendelken's strengths, it could leverage an advantage.

If the match extends to a deciding set, Xilas has a statistically higher chance of prevailing given his better record in such scenarios. Despite this, Wendelken’s ability to handle break points effectively makes him a formidable opponent throughout any match length.

Considering these dynamics, while both players display unique strengths, the slight edge in pressure situations and the ability to convert key points may position Harry Wendelken as the likely winner of the upcoming match.